Showing posts with label worship song analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label worship song analysis. Show all posts

“I” Trouble: The “We-I Balance” in Corporate Song (Part 3)

If you have followed me this far, you know I have been analyzing our Sunday setlists for signs of “I” trouble. If you missed the first two parts you will want to read at least the first one: Part 1, Part2.

I have been altering my song planning to bring more of a balance between “We” and “I” songs. In a 6 song set with a “We-I” Balance of -4, changing only one "I" song (-1) to a "We" song (1) will change the balance to -2. I’m finding that to achieve the 1 to -1 balance I am targeting, requires only minor changes when planning a set.

I’m also evaluating new songs differently as a result. I just recently finished introducing a new song. There were two songs I had been working on: “Speak, O Lord” by Getty and Townend and the classic hymn “Day by Day and with Each Passing Moment”. Both are excellent songs, but I chose “Speak, O Lord” because it was a “We” song in a song category dominated by I songs (the other 5 songs were “I” songs!).
I am also curious as to the balance in other Christian worship settings. I decided I would take advantage of the Sunday setlist data at Fred McKinnon.com. For this analysis I used Week 59, September 6, 2009.

My goal is to understand, not individually critique song selection, so I decided to pick 10 sites at random and report the “We-I” Balance and overall average balance without identifying the sites selected. I used Excel to list the posts in numerical order and generated a random number beside each and the sorted the list by the random numbers and looked up the songs for the first 10 sites listed. If I could not find the lyrics for all songs in the set, I did not include it in the results. I ended up with 8 sites where I was able to find the lyrics for all the songs listed and calculate the “We-I” Balance for each set.
Here are the results:



The Average “We-I” Balance for the eight set lists was -2.4. Which pretty much matched my average of -2.3 at Pine Lodge Corrections Center for Women which is more "I" dominant than the average at Medical Lake Community Church of -1.6.

What do the results tell us? Clearly, we favor songs with “I” over songs with “We”. But remember, this is only a one week snapshot. What I believe has more value is what this number looks like over time. I’m concerned about the faith impact of “I” dominant song sets on the church and individual believers.

So what is the big deal? From my vantage point, simply this: I believe that worship is formative. What we sing matters. If corporate worship is to truly be corporate, and the church is to worship as the body of Christ instead of an assembly of individuals, the songs we sing should reflect that intention. My goal is to reinforce the corporate nature of worship by balancing the use of “I” songs with “We” songs. To not do so would be to capitulate to our individualistic American culture that continually tells us in many ways that it is all about me. Balancing “We” and “I” in planning set lists is one way I can be strategic in song selection, but it is not a substitute for finding and using great songs that help disciple believers.

What do you think?

“I” Trouble: The “We-I Balance” in Corporate Song (Part 2)

If you missed Part 1, you will want to read it first.

The best worship songs are God centered; however, we have a tendency to show up most of our songs in "I" form or "We" form, or both. In an individualistic American society I worry that our corporate worship is more about "me" than "we". What follows is my analysis of our master playlist and several months worth of our actual setlists.

Fortunately for us, we recently scaled back our playlist from 267 songs to about 120, so scoring all the songs did not take very long especially since they are all in a database and I can open each quickly by clicking on the titles from a playlist view and enter a number in a new field I created for each song’s information. I have to admit, I was concerned when I started scoring the songs. I really wasn’t sure how “I” dominate our playlist would be.

I scored all the songs on our playlist and got a -23 which for 120 songs means we lean towards the “I” side but still have a fair number of “we” or neutral songs to choose from. If you were to place -23 on the We-I Balance appropriately scaled it would place us just beyond -1 towards the “I” Dominant side. I was surprised; I expected to be further from 0 on the “I” Dominant side.

Here are the summary numbers by song category (Note: the categories are linked to my blog entries describing each one):

Openers: 1 (19 songs)
GITS: 9 (35 songs)
Holy Spirit: -5 (15 songs)
Response Songs: -11 (15 songs)
Communion Songs: -12 (16 songs)
Closers: -4 (19 songs)

As I look at these numbers the Closers category stands out as one I would like more “We” songs in; the idea is to send out the congregation singing like a congregation, not individuals. I expected to see large negative numbers for the Response and Communion songs but was surprised when the Holy Spirit songs weren’t right up there with them. Overall we could use more “We” songs. Interestingly some “I” songs could be changed to “We” songs with little or no difficulty, but without requesting permission from the songwriters, it would probably violate the copyright laws.

The real test is how we actually use the songs in worship services; our playlist is just the list of songs we choose from,. Do we have “I” trouble. Because our play record is in the database, the answer is only a query and report away. Here are the summarized results for each week.

Medical Lake Community Church (MLCC)

Date We-I Balance
8/16/2009 -4
8/9/2009 -1
8/2/2009 -4
7/26/2009 -1
7/19/2009 -3
7/12/2009 -1
7/5/2009 -5
6/28/2009 0
6/21/2009 1
6/14/2009 -1
6/7/2009 1
5/31/2009 1
5/24/2009 3
5/17/2009 -2
5/10/2009 -2
5/3/2009 -7
4/26/2009 -3
4/19/2009 0

AVERAGE: -1.6

Note the -7 on 5/3/09. I went back and looked at that one! It turns out I led the 7 songs on that service, normal for a Communion service(1st service of the month). I noted that Communion services accounted for more high negative scores but not on 6/7/09 where it was 1; interestingly, I led the songs on that service too!

I have also included the Results from Pine Lodge Corrections Center for Women where I volunteer twice a month.

Pine Lodge Corrections Center for Women (PLCCW)

Date We-I Balance
8/2/2009 -3
7/5/2009 -3
6/21/2009 -1
6/7/2009 0
5/17/2009 -4
5/3/2009 -2
4/19/2009 -3

AVERAGE: -2.3

Clearly I choose more “I” songs at Pine Lodge than MLCC. As I look at the data, I’m pleased that I’m not at -5 or -6 which I think would be to “I” dominant. I think a good target to shoot for is 1 to -1 which would make sure there is a solid “We” presence, yet maintain a personal element. Finding excellent “We” songs in some of the categories I have already mentioned will also help.

Some of you may think I’m being too analytical (a BS in Math and a MS in Systems Management will do that to you!). How long would you be willing to drive your car without a gas gauge? Or, put another way how many walks to the gas station with a can in hand would it take before you get the gas gauge fixed? I don’t want to attach more precision to the numbers than is warranted, but at the same time the numbers do give me a better idea of how congregational our mix of songs is. I’m concerned that our worship of God in song unknowingly reinforces a “me centered” faith. Such an individualistic faith is not characteristic of the faith community of the church described in the New Testament.

Strategic song selection reflects a healthy balance between “I” and “We” songs.

How strategic are you?